David Duke For Ralph Nader

February 29th, 2008, 11:04 AM EST

That’s what he said on my radio show Thursday night. That’s because the other candidates, including Barack Obama, are “for the Jewish extremists who are controlling American policy.”

blueaudio.jpg  audio (mp3)

Posted in Liberaland by Alan
leave a comment • trackback

Responses to this post...

  1. Nader didn’t matter in 2004 because people remembered that he spoiled 2000. So as long as people are reminded of the potential danger of voting for a spoiler, he shouldn’t matter this time around. Ralph Nader did make one good point that I would like to help promote; he points out how narrow the debates have become. They won’t bring up gun control or the military budget among other things. I guess these topics are too dangerous.

    Posted by Justin W.J. in Phoenix
    February 29th, 2008 at 1:54 pm

  2. Criticism of right wing Israeli political influence in American foreign policy is easy to turn into something it’s not. It’s easier yet, when a certified nut like David Duke makes the criticism.

    Dabbling in each other’s affairs is a two way street. The common, problematic thread through it all is a timeless, universally screwy, right wing ideology that knows no borders.

    We’re all secretly controlled by the Bilderberg Group anyway. Or, the Freemasons. Or, the CFR. Or, the Carlyle Group. Or, the Borg.

    Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.

    Posted by anonymouse
    February 29th, 2008 at 3:26 pm

  3. Nader on Guns. http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Ralph_Nader_Gun_Control.htm

    His present position might be different. I’m not sure about his views; too vague.

    Posted by W F G
    February 29th, 2008 at 3:41 pm

  4. [...] courtesy of Alan Colmes’s semi-secret blog, whose blogroll is precisely as fragrant as you’d expect it to be. Why would a white [...]

    Posted by Hot Air » Blog Archive » David Duke: You know who’s looking pretty good for president? Ralph Nader
    February 29th, 2008 at 5:19 pm

  5. alan you must be losing it if you think that giving david duke publicity is a good idea. do you think this discredits nader and helps democrats? nader and duke are both irrelevant, if we ignore them they will go away.

    Posted by mike
    March 1st, 2008 at 12:18 am

  6. Who shows up when Fort Chaffee was experiencing the rioting by Cuban refugees? None other then David Duke!
    Western Arkansas did not need him as their spokesman during that crucial time! It would be nice if the media would not give him a podium to speak on. I thought he left the country. I thought he was living in Ukraine, having nothing to do with America. I hope he leaves again soon.

    Posted by Tim
    March 2nd, 2008 at 12:25 am

  7. Good interview with David Duke. Duke made great points as did you. He is obviously a well seasoned advocate for his people. You couldn’t suck him in and you tried hard to make him look bad. It seems the man has moved on from his KKK days, but you couldn’t let go of that. Most people move on from the things they did in their youth, but this was about playing to white guilt and the Obama’s. Its funny, but Duke usually gets interviews when the left wants to discredit either something Anti-Jewish, Anti-Black or extremely in their favor. God forbid the left is wrong Duke is right. Anyway it was interesting to listen to the debate. Thank-you both. Have Duke back on again soon.

    Posted by Smitty
    March 3rd, 2008 at 7:44 pm

Leave a comment